And some men need to be killed--Gaosi Raditholo, Warrior
Although
I want to spend more time on Pedro Aldomovar and the very rare quality of his
rigorous discipline -- offering an almost seamless challenge to my responsive
dread, reminding me almost of Otto Preminger, who was more obviously
structuralist in his panoramic scope, I want to take a moment to discuss The Book of Eli in
terms of an Inverse critic's contention
that as a Hughes brothers film it’s underrated, despite its heavy Christian
Everyman modality, being at its heart agnostic. The exposition of the script
has its moments: the felines almost look like aliens from Mars, whereas the rat
Eli feeds upon display of his hunting skills looks untouched, and these scenes
may harken back to the old coinage “fat cat,” as representative of Gary Oldman’s
character, and I’d argue that Jennifer Beale weaponizes her pre-flash blindness
in an original fashion, and the motif of utilizing black liberation theology to
carry the burden of white excesses for the sake of equally nascent white
innocence, purity, this is something Denzel knows how to do, when he’s not
otherwise embracing the pseudo militancy of Malcolm X. He plays a similar
sacrificial agent in Man on Fire, but it doesn’t work in this genre, under the
guidance of the Hughes, superimposed on a shocking and merciless post-radiation
environment. The established religion and its most popular biblical text took
centuries to evolve into the sectarian divisions with which we currently abide.
If the rather vague backstory of how Christianity was blamed and purged for a
nuclear deluge holds, and the young adults coming up out of hiding know nothing
of it, then salvation through Christ couldn’t flourish once again, according to
tradition. The Hughes brothers enjoy turning out a wry trick or two as auteurs,
but Eli has a lot of bloodshed with little sensical return. It is a cop out.
No comments:
Post a Comment