If I seem to be coming perilously close to saying ugly people should refrain from engaging in sodomy, you'd be within your rights to object such contention is not much of an argument. People do what they wish, at least to the extent that Goozman has not quite replicated Zamyatin's mistrust of urbanism. I am, however, more or less against homosexuals themselves, which the majority of repressed Protestant liberals would now find untenable.
Leaving that issue aside, liberals find the issue of gay monogamy persuasive as an equal treatment argument. I do not. Families are small islets of self denial, regardless of cultural pressures or permissions, and Slate contributors are already pushing the envelope on bringing pedophiles into the tent, with the caveat that they be medically regulated and or castrated through the course of their lifespans until neurologists can repair their minds. If we keep heading in this direction, what is the point of being human? Or would geneticists say this is an evolutionary continuum?
No comments:
Post a Comment