Saturday, May 13, 2017

Midpoints

"Can I still play the violin?"--Lois Smith


Where Defiance ends and The Man in The High Castle begins in 2015, there is a thematic congruence, one superficial, the other overly dramaturgical. Both series suggest American values have been tested and raise questions in relation to our global role in the aftermath of successful blows on our soil. The “races” of Defiance address pluralistic tensions. The nuclear device in High Castle which incinerates the White House in the Smith family flashback resonates with the same sobering shock as watching the Twin Towers implode on 9/11, not that it need be translated in that fashion, since the series’ creators are faithful to the spirit of Dick’s unsparing depreciation of American sensibilities, however heightened the realism for the sake of Prime’s competitiveness with Netflix, this too something of a retail fiction. Streaming is streaming, whatever we put in the pipeline. I have not gone into High Castle at great length because I sequenced it rapidly after the start of my still ongoing personal crisis, and there is a great deal of material to peel. Whatever viewers feel about Berlin as the superpower du jour, the cinematic quality of SO1 & 2 seems well done to me, and one hopes the set personnel received worthwhile compensation. Amazon proved itself rather shrewd as opposed to SyFy, since revamping Kennedyesque authoritarian alternatives is easier than bringing otherworldliness to St. Louis and beyond. The outer framework of the Defiance plot falls well within the traditions of the genre, and isn’t anything we have not seen before, particularly in print. Megalomania pits itself against the upright and the just. Asimov may be able to get five Foundation novels out of that, but cable television can’t expect its audience to join all those threads so seamlessly. High Castle’s writers have more dramatic tensions and complexity, and Julia Crain manages to play both sides against the middle, just as we aren’t altogether certain about Joe Black’s moral compass, especially given the revelation that he was a Leidermoif [sic] newborn.
The most fluid episodes, those of the Trade Minister’s visions of history as we know it, are more tenuous, though they expose what the citizens of today are meant to appreciate: how fortunate we are to live in a constitutional republic where the descendants of bootleggers were de facto royals who kept us out of war with the Soviets. Dick wasn’t quite so highbrow, and his aims nearly juxtapose those of Ridley Scott and his team. Everything Dick did was an attack on our pretensions, not a tribute to our national innocence.


No comments:

Post a Comment